This article reports on an investigation of officer attitudes towards their evolving duties and increasing need to provide rapid overdose response services, describing the research methodology and outcomes, and noting potential benefits to offering enhanced training and efforts to increase harm reduction principles.
Police officers are stationed on the frontlines of open-air drug markets and regularly intervene in issues resulting from public drug consumption and overdoses. Police departments are increasingly being asked to adopt harm reduction approaches to deal with the health and safety consequences of drug use. As officer buy-in is essential to intervention success, it is important to assess officer attitudes towards their evolving duties. This study draws on over 400 hours of field observation data with transit officers deployed on an overdose rapid response program in Philadelphia’s Kensington neighborhood. Generally, officers were supportive of Narcan for overdose reversal, but some pointed out limitations to its use. Officers also identified how widespread availability of Narcan has changed the local overdose landscape and community response. Officers expressed mixed opinions towards ancillary support via food and clothing distribution by local organizations. They were more supportive of long-term treatment efforts though recognized the rarity of treatment initiation. Findings illuminate a tension in contemporary policing as officers rely less on law enforcement and adapt to harm reduction approaches in their daily work. Their perspectives identify potential benefits to enhanced training and understanding of harm reduction principles among police officers. (Published Abstract Provided)
Downloads
Similar Publications
- Using Data Governance and Data Management in Law Enforcement Building a Research Agenda That Includes Strategy, Implementation, and Needs for Innovation
- Effects of Police Body-Worn Cameras on Citizen Compliance and Cooperation: Findings From a Quasi-Randomized Controlled Trial
- Exploring the Limits of Collaboration and the Fragility of its Outcomes: The Case of Community Policing