Arguing that Gottfredson and Hirschi have misrepresented the aforementioned concepts and the authors' research on these topics, the article reviews the author's definitions of these concepts as used in their research. The article explains that the concept of a criminal career, the distinction between participation and frequency, and the longitudinal research method have considerable value for criminological theory and policy. Specifically, the article reasons that the individual frequency of offending stays constant with age while participation in offending varies with age. Although the authors are not enthusiastic supporters of the concepts of career criminals and selective incapacitation, they do believe these concepts can stimulate important research, although the outcome of debate over these policies has little relevance for the value of research on criminal careers, the participation/frequency distinction, and the longitudinal method. 26 footnotes, 6 figures, and 47 references.
Criminal Career Research: Its Value for Criminology
NCJ Number
110128
Journal
Criminology Volume: 26 Issue: 1 Dated: (February 1988) Pages: 1-35
Date Published
1988
Length
35 pages
Annotation
This article challenges Gottfredson's and Hirschi's (1986) contention that the concepts of criminal careers, career criminals, selective incapacitation, prevalence, incidence, and longitudinal studies have little value for criminology.
Abstract
Date Published: January 1, 1988