In this paper, deterrence variables (perceived certainty and severity) were incorporated into a rational choice mode of common (minor) delinquent offending. The rational choice perspective presumes that crime and delinquency are the products of imperfectly informed choice and that decisions to offend are made, assessed, and remade. It was assumed here that decisions to offend and cease offending would in part be affected by the contemplation of sanction threats in addition to material, affective, and moral considerations. The data in support of the inclusion of deterrence variables in a rational choice model were equivocal. Although perceptions of certain punishment had a significant effect on the decision to commit and desist from some offenses, the observed effects were marginal and far less consequential than were the effects of social costs and other considerations. The data did indicate that certainty of punishment (but not severity) affects some offending decisions. Tables, figures, references. (Publisher's abstract)
Downloads
Related Datasets
Similar Publications
- Medicaid and CHIP Changes for Youth in the Justice System
- Coordinating Council on Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention: Report to Congress and The White House, Fiscal Year 2023–2024
- Naturally-occurring Mentoring Relationships & Criminal Justice Outcomes: A Preliminary Uusing Add Health Use Data