Defensible Decisions: Balancing Employer and Prospective Employee Rights in an Era of Criminal Background Checks

• NCJ Number: 253910
• Journal: Equality Diversity and Inclusion Volume: 5 Issue: 38 Dated: 2019 Pages: 529-546
• Author(s): Megan Kurlychek; Shawn Bushway
• Date Published: 2019
• Length: 18 pages
• Grant Number(s): 2012-MU-MU-0048
• Agencies: NIJ-Sponsored
• Publication Type: Research (Applied/Empirical); Report (Study/Research); Report (Grant Sponsored); Program/Project Description

Annotation

This study examines how one large agency, the New York Department of Health (DOH), navigates a myriad of mandates to convey and create legitimacy in compliance with complex legal mandates and contrasting interests.

Abstract

Employers that use criminal background checks to make hiring determinations must carefully balance the need to protect themselves and their clients against legal mandates designed to protect the rights of individuals with criminal records. Yet, surprisingly little research has examined this balancing act. Prior research on civil right legislation suggests that although companies may create regulations that appear to comply with such mandates, their actual practice does not always comply with their own rules (Dobbin et al., 1988); therefore, this study addressed two key questions: 1) Do the DOH policies appear to comply with the relevant New York State law? 2) Does the DOH effectively implement the policies in a way that upholds New York State law? Specifically, this study estimated probit models on a sample of over 7,000 potential employees with criminal records to determine compliance with the criteria established by law and policy. Findings show that the variables indicated by law/regulations, such as offense severity and time since conviction, work in the intended direction. Using only these criteria, the models correctly predicted clearance decisions approximately of the time and that extra-legal factors such as race and gender do not further influence final determinations. These findings have practical implications for employers, since they show that it is possible for employers to design formal rules that navigate this complex landscape while still providing employment opportunities for individuals with criminal records. This is important as many employers either utilize criminal background checks without regulation or are fearful of embarking on efforts to meet regulations such as those promulgated by the EEOC. This research is the first of its kind to document and explore the ability of a large employer to conduct socially responsible criminal history background checks. (publisher abstract modified)