Each victim was assigned to one of three treatment conditions: interview and written victim impact statement, interview only, and no interview or statement. During the intake procedure, victims rated the effects of their victimization in terms of physical harm, short-term financial impact, long-term financial impact, psychological harm, and behavioral changes. Victims were recontacted after one month to update information in their statements. Contrary to previous findings, the results reported here did not find that victim impact statements resulted in defendants receiving harsher sentences, nor did they produce sentencing decisions that reflected the effects of the crime on victims. There was little evidence that judges were influenced in their sentencing decisions by measures of the effects of crime on victims, once the charge and defendant's criminal history were taken into account. 3 tables, 4 notes, and 22 references
Downloads
Similar Publications
- Reimagining the Norm: Judges on Judging
- Audit of the Office of Justice Programs Victim Assistance Funds Subawarded by the Nevada Division of Child and Family Services to Community Chest, Inc., Virginia City, Nevada
- Individual, Firearm, and Purchasing Characteristics Associated with Risk of Firearm-related Violent Crime Arrest: a Nested Case-control Study