This paper reports on an evaluation of the effectiveness of co-response teams on hospitalization outcomes for people with mental illness who are in crisis, using a place-based randomized controlled trial; it describes the research methodology and findings; and finds that the co-response teams had a significant impact on the reduction of future hospitalizations.
Responding to incidents involving individuals with mental illness has been a challenge for police officers. While co-response teams have been embraced as an effective police response strategy, most prior evaluation studies on co-response teams focused on outcomes that are not directly related to individuals’ subsequent mental health state. Additionally, the lack of experimental research hinders the ability to draw causal conclusions on the effects of co-response teams. To address this knowledge gap, this study evaluated the effectiveness of co-response teams on hospitalization outcomes of individuals in crisis using a place-based randomized controlled trial in southwest Virginia. Street segments with high volumes of mental health calls for service were randomly assigned to either treatment hotspots (n = 113) or control hotspots (n = 115). The results suggest that the co-response teams had a significant effect on reducing subsequent hospitalizations, with an estimated effect size of −0.22. The findings, challenges, and recommendations for future co-response team implementations were discussed. (Published Abstract Provided)
Downloads
Similar Publications
- Introduction to the Special Issue “Environmental Criminology in Crime Prevention: Theories for Practice”
- Examining Radicalization's Risk and Protective Factors: A Case-Control Study of Violent Extremists, Non-Violent Criminal Extremists, Non-offending Extremists & Regular Violent Offenders
- Placial Analysis of Events: a Case Study on Criminological Places