The study found that over time, higher levels of impulsivity were associated with higher levels of property and violent offending. There was also evidence of an amplification process whereby the effects of impulsivity on offending were enhanced in neighborhoods with higher levels of socioeconomic status (SES). Further, the effects of impulsivity were enhanced in neighborhoods with higher levels of collective efficacy and lower levels of criminogenic behavior settings and pro-criminal definitions. A social process risk composite (i.e., an index of collective efficacy, criminogenic behavioral setting, and pro-criminal definitions) reduced the effects of socioeconomic status on the slope of impulsivity. Impulsivity consists of a predisposition toward a wide range of antisocial behaviors rather than toward a single act (Gottfredson and Hirschi, 1990; Wilson and Herrnstein, 1985). Other features of impulsivity are rapid, unplanned actions without forethought or the conscious deliberation of an act and its potential consequences (Moeller et al., 2001). The findings of the current study suggest that the individual characteristic of impulsivity becomes a more prominent factor in delinquent behavior when community characteristics that would foster antisocial behaviors are limited and informal social controls on behavior are strongest. In high-risk neighborhoods, on the other hand, multiple environmental criminogenic factors such as peer influences and the modeling of criminal behavior assumes such importance that impulsivity as an individual factor assumes less importance. The Project of Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods was used to develop multivariate, multilevel item response models to examine whether the effects of impulsivity on offending were amplified in lower risk neighborhoods. 12 tables, 14 figures, and 202 references
Downloads
Similar Publications
- Trends for Background Checks for Firearm Transfers, 1999–2018: The First 20 Years of the Permanent Brady Act Period
- Do Cellmates Matter? A Causal Test of the Schools of Crime Hypothesis With Implications for Differential Association and Deterrence Theories
- Prison Officer Legitimacy, Their Exercise of Power, and Inmate Rule Breaking