This analysis of NIJ-supported research on policing, prosecution, sentencing, corrections, and criminal justice system technology concludes that criminal justice policymaking has benefited greatly from empirical research during the past 20 years.
The majority of this research would not have been possible without Federal support. Federal interest in and support of research has also shaped the criminal justice research agenda, stimulated that growth of that research as an academic field, and helped develop a stronger and more productive link between the research and criminal justice communities. Both communities would undoubtedly benefit from even close involvement through a formal collaborative framework. Specific research findings have focused on the relationship between traditional police practices and their goals, case attrition in jurisdictions across the Nation, the lack of effectiveness of rehabilitation programs in general, the classification of offenders for recidivism risk, and the use of existing and emerging technologies to handle specific operational problems. Detailed descriptions of findings, list of persons interviewed, and 133 references
Downloads
Similar Publications
- Examining Radicalization's Risk and Protective Factors: A Case-Control Study of Violent Extremists, Non-Violent Criminal Extremists, Non-offending Extremists & Regular Violent Offenders
- The Lethality Assessment Program 2.0: Adjusting Intimate Partner Violence Risk Assessment to Account for Strangulation Risk
- Criminal Crews, Codes, and Contexts: Differences and Similarities across the Code of the Street, Convict Code, Street Gangs, and Prison Gangs