This paper reports on the research methodology and findings from an examination of prison personnel survey responses about their views of extended solitary confinement and its harms on prison inmates.
The use of extended solitary confinement (ESC) has received domestic and international condemnation for its potential effects on the mental health of incarcerated persons. Despite the criticism, prison systems continue to rely on the practice. To advance understanding of why the housing is used and how correctional personnel view it, this study develops a theoretical model, based on concepts of human agency, empathy, and punitiveness, to examine perceptions of ESC and its effects on the mental health of incarcerated persons. The study examines survey responses from prison personnel who have worked in ESC and finds that personnel hold mixed views about ESC’s harms. Structural equation modeling indicates that perceptions about agency and empathy influence views about ESC and whether it harms the mental health of incarcerated persons in the housing. These relationships are mediated by punitiveness and point to nuanced views that personnel hold about ESC’s impacts. (Published Abstract Provided)
Downloads
Similar Publications
- Risk and Rehabilitation: Supporting the Work of Probation Officers in the Community Reentry of Extremist Offenders
- FY 2024 Solicitation Overview: Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) Program—Local Solicitation
- Implementing Evidence-based Supported Employment within Specialty Mental Health Probation: A Hybrid Type I Implementation-effectiveness Trial Protocol