In this paper, researchers studied which kinds of written reminders were most effective for reducing misdemeanor defendants’ failure-to-appear (FTA) rates.
This article examines the effectiveness of using different kinds of written reminders to reduce misdemeanor defendants' failure-to-appear (FTA) rates. A subset of defendants was surveyed after their scheduled court date to assess their perceptions of procedural justice and trust and confidence in the courts. Reminders reduced FTA overall, and more substantive reminders (e.g., with information on the negative consequences of FTA) were more effective than a simple reminder. FTA varied depending on several offense and offender characteristics, such as geographic location (urban vs. rural), type of offense, and number of offenses. The reminders were somewhat more effective for Whites and Hispanics than for Blacks. Defendants with higher institutional confidence and those who felt they had been treated more fairly by the criminal justice system were more likely to appear, though the effectiveness of the reminder was greatest among misdemeanants with low levels of trust in the courts. The implications for public policy and pretrial services are discussed. (Published Abstract Provided)
Downloads
Similar Publications
- Justice-Involved Women Veterans: Recommendations for gender-inclusivity in Veteran Treatment Courts
- Life Events and Other Stressors of Diversion Drug Court Participants: An Exploratory Analysis of Race and Gender Differences
- At Risk and Underserved: Veterans Treatment Court Team Member Perspectives on Service Delivery Challenges