NCJ Number
109409
Journal
Justice System Journal Volume: 12 Issue: 2 Dated: (Fall, 1987) Pages: 177-195
Date Published
1987
Length
19 pages
Annotation
Though their advocates contend that individual calendars motivate judges to manage caseloads, these arguments have been made primarily on commonsense grounds.
Abstract
This paper suggests a theoretical basis for understanding the motivational effects of calendaring systems, drawing on 'social loafing' theory and research that shows people work harder alone than in groups. It argues that judges on trial courts are small groups vis-a-vis the task of caseload disposition and that calendaring practices vary the identifiability, distinctiveness, and perceived dispensability of contributions to caseload disposition -- dimensions important to individuals' motivations to perform. The article summarizes experimental research, considers its applicability to courts and caseload disposition, and concludes with a discussion of implications for research on courts and for practical problems of caseload management. 34 references. (Publisher abstract modified)
Date Published: January 1, 1987
Downloads
Similar Publications
- Judicial Views on Confidentiality and Information Sharing in the Juvenile Justice System: A Survey of Virginia Juvenile Court Judges
- Anatomy of Discretion: Criminal Justice Professor Don Stemen Explains a Vera Institute of Justice Analysis of Prosecutorial Decision Making (Video: Part I of IV)
- Federal Justice Statistics, 2012 - Statistical Tables