This paper reports on a study that examined contributing factors to whether officers value procedurally just interaction techniques, and how the effects of warrior/guardian mentalities may vary based on individual personalities; it seeks to inform police leaders and policymakers as they work to improve police-community relations.
The current study sought to better understand the factors that contribute to whether officers value procedurally just interaction techniques and contribute to the limited research examining how the effects of warrior and guardian mentalities may vary based on individual officer characteristics. Survey data collected from patrol officers in two geographically different and ethnically diverse United States police departments allowed for an examination of the generality of warrior and guardian orientations on perceptions of procedural justice across gender, race and/or ethnicity, military service, education, and experience. There was a largely invariant effect of the mentalities on officer attitudes toward procedural justice, except for officers of color. In this sample, the guardian effect on prioritizing procedural justice was stronger for officers of color than for White officers. This study sheds light on our theoretical understanding of the warrior/guardian framework and offers practical implications for police leaders and policymakers in their effort to improve police-community relations. (Published Abstract Provided)
Downloads
Similar Publications
- Does Procedural Justice Moderate the Effect of Collective Efficacy on Police Legitimacy?
- Pulling Back the Veil of Darkness: A Proposed Road Map to Disentangle Racial Disparities in Traffic Stops, a Research Note
- Assessing the Fit Between U.S. Sponsored Training and the Needs of Ukrainian Police Agencies