This study examines disparities in child sexual abuse material exposure and mental health factors among police investigators and forensic examiners through network analysis.
This network analysis of disparities in child sexual abuse material (CSAM) exposure and mental health factors among police investigators and forensic examiners contributes to comprehension of the distinct experiences and challenges faced by CSAM investigators and forensic examiners, and specifically the nuanced disparities between CSAM investigators and forensic examiners in terms of their exposure to CSAM content and the associated mental health factors. These insights highlight the imperative need for tailored support mechanisms and interventions that can effectively address the unique challenges encountered by individuals working tirelessly in this critical field. Despite acknowledging the detrimental impact of CSAM exposure on the mental and physical well-being of investigators and forensic examiners, there is a need for comprehensive exploration into the complex relationship between CSAM exposure, its various dimensions, mental health (i.e., anxiety, depression, and PTSD), and burnout, as well as the presence of positive attitudes towards the job. To understand how CSAM exposure, mental health and burnout interconnect and cluster within distinct networks of police investigators and forensic examiners. Police investigators and forensic examiners from across the United States who were exposed to CSAM as part of their professions (N = 470). Participants, recruited through connections with the National Criminal Justice Training Center, completed an anonymous online survey. The network analysis revealed differences in centrality between investigators and forensic examiners, particularly in their associations with exposure factors and mental health variables. Edges invariance tests showed differences in the strength of these associations, with some factors being more strongly linked to PTSD avoidance symptoms among investigators and others among forensic examiners. Stability analyses suggested potentially greater heterogeneity among investigators, while both groups displayed high stability in other centrality indices. (Published Abstract Provided)