NCJ Number
252416
Journal
Forensic Science International-Genetics Volume: 28 Dated: May 2017 Pages: 195-202
Date Published
May 2019
Length
8 pages
Annotation
This study constructed pipe bombs that were spiked with known amounts of biological material in order to recover "touch" DNA from the surface of the device and to recover traces of blood from the ends of wires (simulated finger prick).
Abstract
Improvised explosive devices (IEDs), such as pipe bombs, are weapons used to detrimentally affect people and communities. A readily accessible brand of exploding targets called Tannerite has been identified as a potential material for abuse as an explosive in pipe bombs. The ability to recover and genotype DNA from such weapons may be vital in the effort to identify suspects associated with these devices. Although it is possible to recover DNA from post-blast fragments using short tandem repeat markers (STRs), genotyping success can be negatively affected by low quantities of DNA, degradation, and/or PCR inhibitors. Alternative markers such as insertion/null (INNULs) and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are bi-allelic genetic markers that are shorter genomic targets than STRs for amplification, which are more likely to resist degradation. The bombs used in the current study were detonated with the binary explosive Tannerite using double-base smokeless powder to initiate the reaction. DNA extracted from the post-blast fragments was quantified with the Quantifiler Trio DNA Quantification Kit; STR analysis was conducted using the GlobalFiler Amplification Kit; INNULs were amplified using an early-access version of the InnoTyper 21 Kit; and SNP analysis via massively parallel sequencing (MPS) was performed using the HID-Ion Ampliseq Identity and Ancestry panels using the Ion Chef and Ion PGM sequencing system. Study results showed that INNUL markers resulted in the most complete genetic profiles when compared to STR and SNP profiles. The random match probabilities calculated for samples using INNULs were lower than with STRs when less than 14 STR alleles were reported. These results suggest that INNUL analysis may be well suited for low-template and/or degraded DNA samples and may be used to supplement incomplete or failed STR analysis. Human identification using SNP analysis via MPS showed variable success with low-level post-blast samples in this study (<150 pg). While neat DNA samples (6 ìL input as recommended) resulted in <50 percent of SNP calls, samples that were concentrated from 15 ìL to 6 ìL (15 ìL was added for STR and INNUL typing) resulted in more complete SNP profiles. Five out of six blood samples recovered from the wires attached to the pipe-bombs resulted in the correct ancestry predictions. (Publisher abstract modified)