U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Aspects of the Control of Commercial Fraud in the United Kingdom (From Report for 1986 and Resource Series No. 31: UNAFEI, P 89-102, April 1987, Hideo Utsuro, ed. -- See NCJ-115311)

NCJ Number
115312
Author(s)
L H Leigh
Date Published
1987
Length
14 pages
Annotation
This article reviews recent developments concerning commercial fraud and its control in the United Kingdom.
Abstract
Commercial fraud includes frauds by and on corporations, frauds in relation to shares and other corporate securities, frauds on the revenue, commodities, and banking and shipping fraud. Some of the contemporary manifestations of fraud in England are outlined, including internal frauds, 'window-dressing,' and bribery. The deficiencies in English law in controlling fraud are the following: (1) the mental element in theft and dishonesty is difficult to work; (2) English law does not define information as property for the purposes of theft; and (3) there are problems with the unauthorized disposition of corporate property. Market manipulation and other dishonest dealings in securities are being dealt with by the new Financial Services Bill, which makes it an offense for a person to do anything which creates a false or misleading impression as to the market in or the price and value of any investments. English law enforcement institutions look fragmented in their attempt to investigate and prosecute fraud cases. The police role is that of investigation, and is essentially reactive. Other agencies, such as the Inland Revenue, Customs and Excise and Department of Trade, are also involved in investigation and criminal proceedings. Fraud trial procedures are fraught with problems, including the unsuitability of jury trials, defense disclosures, and complicated rules of evidence. Lenient sentences and disqualification orders are common in fraud cases. Extraterritoriality and interstate cooperation are discussed. 58 notes.

Downloads

No download available