U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Assessing the Evidentiary Value of Smokeless Powder Comparisons

NCJ Number
249966
Journal
Forensic Science International Volume: 259 Dated: February 2016 Pages: 179-187
Author(s)
D. M.K. Dennis; M. R. Williams; M. E. Sigman
Date Published
February 2016
Length
9 pages
Annotation
This study analyzed gas chromatography-electron ionization-mass spectrometry (GC-EI-MS) and physical characteristics data for 726 smokeless reloading powders by pairwise comparisons of samples comprising the same product and different products.
Abstract
In the discrete and continuous data comparisons, the likelihood ratios for probabilities conditioned on same shape, color, presence/absence of perforation and size were found to provide relatively limited support for either the proposition of same product or different product. Further restricting the pairwise comparisons to samples belonging to the same cluster, as determined by agglomerative hierarchical cluster analysis, provided probability distributions for same product and different product comparisons that were more normal, but did not improve the resulting likelihood ratios. These results inform the forensic analyst regarding the evidentiary value of database search results and direct comparisons of recovered and control samples of smokeless powders. Pairwise comparisons were restricted to samples having matching kernel shape, color, presence or absence of a perforation and measurements. Discrete results were analyzed for same and different products having matching chemical composition determined from a list of 13 organic components. A continuous score-based likelihood ratio was determined for same and different product comparisons using the Fisher transform of the Pearson correlation between the total ion spectra of the compared samples. Probability distributions for same product and different product comparisons appeared bimodal and were modeled with kernel density distributions. (Publisher abstract modified)