NCJ Number
238391
Date Published
August 2011
Length
68 pages
Annotation
This report presents findings and recommendations from a multi-method evaluation of the InsideOut Dad program operating in three Community Education Centers (CEC) Residential Reentry Centers in New Jersey; this program focuses on developing pro-fathering knowledge, attitudes, and behavior to help male parolees interact responsibly with their children.
Abstract
Several of the evaluation's findings indicate that the program was welcomed by the residents and staff. In addition, the quantitative and qualitative analyses indicated that the program has been successful in achieving many of its goals. Improvements were found in participants' confidence, self-esteem, knowledge, behavior, and attitudes. When the populations were compared at pre-test surveys, there were few significant differences across sites and between the experimental and control groups. Confidence and self-esteem changes were tested by using nonparametric measures of significance. Changes in parenting knowledge were measures with 2 scales: a 26-question test from the InsideOut Dad survey and 8 statements from the PARI. Many significant positive changes were identified through two-tailed t-tests between the pre-test and post-surveys at each site. Self-reported parenting behavior was measured through calling, writing, and visiting. Very few changes occurred in the control group between the pre-test and post-tests on any portion of the survey. During the evaluation period, 307 participants graduated from the program, completing both pre-test and post-test surveys. The evaluation period ended in June 2011. Six recommendations focus on ways to improve the program. First, facilitators should focus on expected release dates when forming groups. Second, National Fatherhood Initiative should work closely with participating institutions in incorporating components that directly involve participants' children and/or other family members. Third, an alumni program should be formed to allow for continued participation, mentoring, and guidance beyond the program period. Fourth, any future curriculum changes should consider fathering knowledge questions that scored relatively low on post-test surveys. Fifth, future evaluation research on this program should include long-term follow-up surveys and/or interviews with participants. Sixth, the program should be implemented as a standard, evidence-based program at the CEC sites. 41 references and appended pre-survey and post-survey instruments, participant interview guide, and stakeholder interview guide