NCJ Number
230927
Date Published
2010
Length
25 pages
Annotation
This chapter argues that evaluation of any form of rehabilitative intervention for offenders must move away from the 'blind empiricism' of outcomes research to consider why and how certain individuals desist from offending.
Abstract
Desistance theory and research, which examine why and how individuals with a history of offending stop their criminal behaviors, typically lack attention to organized practice frameworks that facilitate desistance. Developments in motivational theory and practice, which have been influential in corrections, are consistent with elements of the desistance paradigm; however, to date they are used as methods for modifying applications of the risk-management paradigm. This chapter focuses on the features of a more integrative correctional practice framework that is evidence-based in being attentive to the interplay of factors that assist individual offenders in their ongoing, challenging efforts to desist from their criminal behavior. This proposed model relies on 'sense and sensitivity'. 'Sense' must be used in deciding how to incorporate a broad range of evidence on desistance into the design and delivery of services to offenders; and 'sensitivity' must be involved in how probation/parole officers gradually guide offender's self-initiated change, rather than forcing and shaping change within a time-limited predetermined intervention. The supervision model must give priority to offenders' goals and preferences; what they value; their personal experiences; and their emotional, social/interpersonal, and identity concerns. The chapter suggests some program developments that reflect this model of 'sense and sensibility'. 6 figures, 4 notes, and 76 references