The authors discuss their analysis of relevant studies to determine the overall effectiveness of restorative justice programs in reducing juvenile recidivism.
Existing reviews of the impact of restorative justice programs on juvenile recidivism have reached mixed conclusions. The present meta-analysis identified relevant studies through a systematic search of 20 databases over a 25-year period as well as the ancestry method. Application of inclusion criteria resulted in a set of 21 studies contributing 21 independent effect sizes. Programs were found to be overall effective at reducing recidivism, with a pooled odds ratio of 1.28. Subgroup analyses indicate strong evidence that study and treatment characteristics play a role in evaluation results, such as strength of research design and racial/ethnic mix of program participants. The overall quality of the literature is relatively weak, with the large majority of studies derived from non-peer-reviewed sources and a lack of detail presented on treatment characteristics. Limitations with respect to exclusion criteria, sample sizes, and between-study heterogeneity are discussed. Publisher Abstract Provided
Downloads
Similar Publications
- Coordinating Council on Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention: Report to Congress and The White House, Fiscal Year 2023–2024
- Coordinating Council on Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention: Independent Practitioner Report on Youth Justice, Report to Congress, Fiscal Year 2023–2024
- Recidivism Risk Factors among Mississippi Justice-involved Youth: Latent Class Analysis of the SAVRY