Cessation of Family Violence: Deterrence and Dissuasion (From NIJ Working Conference on Family Violence as a Criminal Justice Issue, 1986 -- See NCJ-115203)

• NCJ Number: 115208
• Author(s): J Fagan
• Date Published: 1986
• Length: 40 pages
• Publication Format: Document
• Publication Type: Literature Review
• Language: English
• Country: United States of America

Annotation

A consistent finding in criminological research has been the phenomenon of desistance. While most offenders have a few episodes of crime, others stop only after sustained and lengthy criminal involvement, and others shift from patterns of continuous to episodic involvement and intermittent relapses.

Abstract

Recent research, such as that with substance addiction, suggests that common processes can be identified in the cessation of various behavior patterns. Desistance is the outcome of processes that begin with aversive consequences leading to a decision to desist. Desisters substitute new social networks and ideological supports in order to sustain a transformed social identity. Family violence research suggests that desistance occurs in nearly three-fourths of cases following legal sanctioning, but the prolonged duration of cessation is unknown beyond brief study periods. Batterers with shorter, less severe histories have a greater likelihood of desisting than those with more serious patterns of family violence. Victim initiated strategies that may lead to desistance may include social and legal sanctions, actions to create aversive consequences (e.g., divorce, loss of children, or social disclosure). In some cases, desistance may involve displacement, such as when a violent spouse finds a new victim. A model of desistance from family violence should include three stages: decision, discontinuance, and maintenance. Further research in this area is needed. 13 footnotes, 3 tables, and 50 references. (Author abstract modified)