U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Challenges of Conducting Research in Drug Treatment Court Settings

NCJ Number
198590
Journal
Substance Use & Misuse Volume: 37 Issue: 12 & 13 Dated: October/November 2002 Pages: 1635-1664
Author(s)
Steven Belenko Ph.D.
Editor(s)
Stanley Einstein Ph.D.
Date Published
October 2002
Length
30 pages
Annotation
This article discusses the development of drug treatment court research for the past 10 years, the current state of research on drug treatment courts, and the organizational and scientific challenges to conducting research in drug treatment court settings.
Abstract
This author provides a background review of drug treatment courts' evolution and follows with a review of drug treatment court research. It is noted that national and local interest in drug treatment courts has grown since the first program was established in Miami, Florida, in 1989. As of May 2001, there were 688 operational drug treatment courts and 432 in various stages of planning in the United States. The U.S. Department of Justice provides approximately $50 million a year to fund the planning and implementation of drug treatment courts. However, it is noted that even with this support and the overall popularity of the program, little rigorous empirical research has been done on the operations, impacts, and economic impacts of drug treatment courts. Organizational challenges and scientific challenges to doing this research are described. Suggestions offered for improving and expanding drug treatment courts research are discussed under topic headings such as research frameworks, management information system issues, research and policymaker partnerships, analytical issues, and improving comparative data. In conclusion, recommendations are provided for improving the scope and rigor of drug treatment courts research. A source list of references is provided.

Downloads

No download available

Availability