NCJ Number
128531
Journal
Journal of State Government Volume: 63 Issue: 2 Dated: special issue (April-June 1990) Pages: 50-51
Date Published
1990
Length
2 pages
Annotation
The Federal government's refusal to involve municipalities in the drug strategy hampers efforts to stop drug use in inner cities.
Abstract
Despite presidential recognition of the critical role cities play in the war on drugs, the Federal strategy provides no direct funding for cities, no Federal-municipal partnership, and no recognition of local efforts. If cities are to fight back against drugs, the Federal government needs to increase Federal assistance to cities. Only 3 percent of $20 billion spent by the Federal government over the past 10 years to fight drugs has reached State and local governments. The lack of local involvement in drug control, combined with a cumbersome process of receiving funds through States, eliminates any role local officials can play in developing an effective antidrug strategy. Federal cuts in domestic programs over the last 10 years have resulted in local governments assuming increased responsibilities with fewer resources. Yet, with limited revenue options, local governments are expected to spend more on the drug war. Despite limited Federal support, cities are taking the lead in fighting back against drugs. For example, New Orleans' senior citizens are encouraged to talk to young people about the dangers of drugs. An Oregon city has a number of educational programs for students, parents, and municipal employees. Baltimore has passed an ordinance calling for tougher penalties for drug dealing near schools. A long-term commitment to a Federal-urban partnership is needed that focuses on causes rather than symptoms of drug abuse.