Clarifying Policy Options on Drug Trafficking: Harm Minimization is Distinct From Legalization (From Reduction of Drug-Related Harm, P 108-121, 1992, P.A. O'Hare, R. Newcombe, eds. et al., - see NCJ-138254)

• NCJ Number: 138260
• Author(s): N Dorn
• Date Published: 1992
• Length: 14 pages
• Sale Source: Routledge
• Publication Type: Legislation/Policy Description
• Language: English
• Country: United Kingdom

Annotation

When the principle of minimization of harm is applied as a response of the criminal justice system to drug trafficking, four basic approaches can be identified: escalating penalties for trafficking, decriminalization of possession for personal use while maintaining severe penalties for trafficking, full legalization of drug markets, and reduction in penalties for trafficking.

Abstract

According to this author, the future of drug control in the United States lies in focusing on drug use associated with minorities and escalating penalties for trafficking offenses. The second approach, known as Hollandization, consists of a partial decriminalization of cannabis possession, an emphasis on treatment and needle exchanges, and a rejection of a purely crime control perspective. Those who advocate legalization of the trade in drugs, including heroin and cocaine, promote three viewpoints: focusing on the potential impact on consumption levels, the impact on various indexes of harm, and probable consequences for the developing countries within which psychoactive plants are cultivated. The best way to minimize negative outcomes, according to this author, is to ban drug trafficking but shift resources within the criminal justice system from incarceration to investigation. 11 references