NCJ Number
85684
Date Published
1982
Length
38 pages
Annotation
In most instances, current classification schemes are geared primarily toward offender management and risk assessment, and they should move toward the development of comprehensive, differential-effects treatment systems.
Abstract
Ideal classification systems combine theoretical and managerial considerations which in turn facilitate the provision of planned programs for different types of offenders in ways that permit program evaluation. There is a critical need for corrections research to address the issues of differential effects. Specifically, corrections must know which distinctions among offenders make a difference in combination of interventions and which combinations of intervention processes will lead to what changes in different categories of offenders. Regardless of the type of organizational structure used for classification, the system should be so designed that each case is tracked from entry into the system until the offender leaves correctional control. The comprehensive classification process envisioned requires a better application of technology than is currently used in most corrections systems. What is needed is the development of objective data and modern electronic data processing equipment to facilitate easy access to point-in-time results, period-in-time reports, automatic notifications, and statistical-analytical relationships at a moments's notice. The classification process for inmates should consist of the following somewhat overlapping processes: (1) the initial classification process at the point of client intake, (2) reception and orientation of inmates to the corrections experience, (3) periodic reassessments and evaluations, (4) screening and classification for community release programs, (5) appeals boards processes, and (6) evaluation and feedback. Five footnotes and 61 references are provided.