U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Comparing Private and Public Prison Services and Programs in Minnesota: Findings From Prisoner Interviews

NCJ Number
182803
Journal
Current Issues in Criminal Justice Volume: 11 Issue: 2 Dated: November 1999 Pages: 202-232
Author(s)
Judith Greene
Date Published
November 1999
Length
31 pages
Annotation
A summary review of research on private correctional facilities in the United States provides background for an investigation of prison privatization in Minnesota.
Abstract
The Minnesota research was designed to produce an objective comparison of the correctional services and programs available in four medium-security prisons in Minnesota. The goal was to determine what has been the past experience -- the benefits, the problems, and the limitations -- with privatization of institutional correctional services and to compare services and program quality with Minnesota's public prisons. All four of the prisons involved in the study have been operating for many years. Three of the prisons were publicly operated, and the fourth was the Prairie Correctional Facility (PCF) in Appleton, a private correctional facility that began operating in 1993. The research involved a review of Department of Corrections files and records as well as similar documents from the PCF. Site visits were made to observe prison programs and to obtain qualitative data regarding their content and operation. The central component of the study was survey research that involved interviews with prisoners from both the medium-security prisons and PCF. Interview data provided insights about significant differences in correctional service delivery and program operations. The research findings add significant evidence to a growing perception that a pattern of deficiencies in the way private prisons are being managed in the United States are proving them to be unsuitable for handling prisoners above the lowest levels of security classification. These deficiencies include inadequate programming, unreliable classification methods, and insufficient numbers of experienced, well-trained personnel. 4 tables and 15 references