NCJ Number
5112
Journal
Southern California Law Review Volume: 45 Issue: 2 Dated: (SPRING 1972) Pages: 616-684
Date Published
1972
Length
70 pages
Annotation
BEHAVIORAL CONTROL TECHNIQUES BEING APPLIED IN CALIFORNIA'S PRISONS AND MENTAL HOSPITALS WITH POSSIBLE CONSTITUTIONAL LIMITATIONS ON THEIR USE.
Abstract
THESE TECHNIQUES ARE CLASSIFIED ACCORDING TO THEIR DEGREE OF COERCIVENESS. THE AUTHOR ANALYZED THE USE OF ANECTINE, A DRUG WHICH INDUCES TEMPORARY PARALYSIS AND RESPIRATORY FAILURE, IN THERAPY PROGRAMS AT THREE INSTITUTIONS. JUDICIAL DECISIONS ON THE INMATE'S RIGHT TO TREATMENT AND REHABILITATION ARE SUMMARIZED. THE QUESTION OF AN INMATE'S RIGHT TO REFUSE SPECIFIC KINDS OF TREATMENT IS CONSIDERED. ARGUMENTS FOR SUCH A RIGHT ARE DEVELOPED FROM CASES ON THE RIGHT TO PRIVACY, CRUEL AND UNUSUAL PUNISHMENT, AND DUE PROCESS. THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR A FULLY INFORMED INMATE CONSENT TO BEHAVIOR MODIFICATION TREATMENT ARE DISCUSSED.