NCJ Number
42554
Journal
Catholic University Law Review Volume: 25 Issue: 1 Dated: (FALL 1975) Pages: 42-101
Date Published
1975
Length
60 pages
Annotation
THIS REVIEW DISCUSSES THE PARTICIPATION OF INMATES IN PRISON DECISIONMAKING AS GUARANTEED BY THE DUE PROCESS CLAUSE OF THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT AND SUBSTANTIVE LIMITATIONS ON TREATMENT UNDER THE EIGHTH AMENDMENT.
Abstract
THE ARTICLE COMMENTS AND REVIEWS CASE LITERATURE AND STUDIES ON FEDERALLY PROTECTED RIGHTS OF PRISONERS, DISCIPLINARY HEARINGS, NONDISCIPLINARY DECISIONS, RELIEF, AND THE EFFECT OF FEDERAL INTERVENTION. THE SUPREME COURT'S DECISION IN WOLFF V. MCDONNELL (1974), WHICH HELD THAT THERE ARE CERTAIN DUE PROCESS REQUIREMENTS THAT MUST BE MET IN DISCIPLINARY HEARINGS, IS ANALYZED AS A LANDMARK CASE....TWH