U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Confidence Inflation in Eyewitnesses: Seeing is Not Believing

NCJ Number
243399
Journal
Legal and Criminological Psychology Volume: 18 Issue: 1 Dated: February 2013 Pages: 152-167
Author(s)
Amy Bradfield Douglass; Eric E. Jones
Date Published
February 2013
Length
16 pages
Annotation
This study examined whether sensitivity to confidence inflation evidence is enhanced by seeing a videotape of the identification procedure.
Abstract
Confidence inflation in eyewitnesses obscures a useful cue to identification accuracy and affects evaluations of eyewitnesses (e.g., Bradfield & McQuiston, 2004; Jones, Williams, & Brewer, 2008). The authors examined whether sensitivity to confidence inflation evidence is enhanced by seeing a videotape of the identification procedure. Participants (N= 131) watched a videotaped trial in which the witness's original confidence statement was presented as part of a previously recorded videotaped identification procedure or read by the witness at trial. In addition, the witness's identification confidence was either consistently high or low at the time of the identification and high at the trial (i.e., it was inflated). Significant interactions demonstrated that confidence inflation evidence factored into judgments of the eyewitness and defendant guilt more strongly in the videotape condition compared with the read condition. The present results support recommendations to collect immediate confidence reports and videotape identification procedures. Using videotape evidence may help innocent defendants convince jurors that the eyewitness's identification is not accurate. Abstract published by arrangement with John Wiley & Sons.