U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

CONSENT SEARCH AND ADVICE OF FOURTH AMENDMENT RIGHTS

NCJ Number
12115
Journal
FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin Volume: 42 Issue: 11 Dated: (NOVEMBER 1973) Pages: 23-27
Author(s)
D J MCLAUGHLIN
Date Published
1973
Length
5 pages
Annotation
REVIEW OF CASES CONCERNING CAUTIONARY WARNINGS BY POLICE PRIOR TO A VALID CONSENT SEARCH.
Abstract
DESPITE A LOWER COURT DECISION REQUIRING POLICE TO WARN SUBJECTS OF CONSENT SEARCHES OF THEIR FOURTH AMENDMENT RIGHTS, MOST COURTS HAVE STOPPED SHORT OF ANNOUNCING AN EXPLICIT MIRANDA-TYPE GUIDELINE FOR POLICE IN THESE SITUATIONS. THIS ARTICLE DISTINGUISHES CUSTODIAL AND NON-CUSTODIAL CONSENT SEARCHES. THE SUPREME COURT HAS HELD THAT IN THE ABSENCE OF CUSTODY, A POLICE WARNING OF THE RIGHT TO REFUSE CONSENT IS NOT ESSENTIAL TO THE SEARCH'S VALIDITY. THE PROSECUTION IS REQUIRED, HOWEVER, TO PROVE THAT CONSENT IS VOLUNTARY, AND EVIDENCE THAT A WARNING HAS BEEN GIVEN STRONGLY SUPPORTS THIS CONCLUSION. A REQUIREMENT FOR WARNING OF RIGHTS BEFORE A SUSPECT WHO IS IN CUSTODY GIVES CONSENT IS STILL AN OPEN QUESTION.