NCJ Number
16138
Journal
Judicature Volume: 56 Issue: 7 Dated: (FEBRUARY 1973) Pages: 274-278
Date Published
1973
Length
5 pages
Annotation
ARGUMENT THAT THE USE OF SURPRISE WITNESSES AND SURPRISE EVIDENCE IN CIVIL AND CRIMINAL CASES SHOULD BE DISALLOWED.
Abstract
THE AUTHOR URGES THE FILING OF BOTH PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANT PRE-TRIAL STATEMENTS A CERTAIN LENGTH OF TIME BEFORE THE TRIAL. THESE STATEMENTS WOULD LIST THE WITNESSES EACH SIDE INTENDED TO CALL, SUMMARIES OF THEIR PROPOSED TESTIMONY, THE EXHIBITS TO BE INTRODUCED INTO EVIDENCE, AND THE PURPOSES FOR THEY ARE TO BE USED. THE AUTHOR ALSO RECOMMENDS DOING AWAY WITH THE REQUIREMENT THAT LITIGANTS VOUCH FOR THEIR WITNESSES. THE PROPOSES, INSTEAD, TO ALLOW THE COURT TO CALL INDIVIDUALS AS COURT WITNESSES, THEREBY GIVING BOTH SIDES THE OPPORTUNITY TO CROSS-EXAMINE.