NCJ Number
221300
Date Published
2007
Length
131 pages
Annotation
This report attempts to provide some insight into criminal justice initiatives and responses to drugs and drug-related offending in Australia by giving an overview of key findings from national and State-based evaluations that have been undertaken of these initiatives.
Abstract
In response to community concerns about the link between drugs and crime and a growing acknowledgement that conventional criminal justice responses to drug dependent offenders have proved to be relatively ineffective, all Australian States and territories have introduced a range of initiatives, such as police drug diversions, intermediate court-based diversion programs, and drug courts, aimed at diverting drug offenders into education, assessment, and treatment with the intent to tackle the underlying issues of drug dependency. Police diversion programs now operate in all eight jurisdictions, while intermediate court-based drug diversions are present in all States except Tasmania. Five States have a drug court in place with only three small jurisdictions left to move in this direction. Taken as a whole, the evaluation results of these programs are positive. However, given the methodological limitations of most of these evaluations, the findings are not conclusive. This simply means that factors other than program involvement may partially explain any observed improvements or benefits. In this context, the positive findings arising from the reoffending and cost effectiveness analyses on the New South Wales (NSW) Drug Court are particularly encouraging due to their sound methodology. In addition, since most of these evaluations focused on the programs during their early establishment phases, the evaluations tell very little about how the programs are currently functioning. Given the amount of funding invested in these various programs and the importance to the wider Australian community of reducing drug-related offending, it is imperative to know whether these programs are achieving their objectives. The intention of this report is to pull together the findings from those outcome-based evaluation reports currently available to the public which may shed some light on this question. Tables, references, list of abbreviations and acronyms