NCJ Number
41241
Journal
Dickinson Law Review Volume: 81 Issue: 3 Dated: (SPRING 1977) Pages: 649-655
Date Published
1977
Length
7 pages
Annotation
REVIEW OF THE U.S. SUPREME COURT RULING IN DOYLE V OHIO (1976) WHICH HELD THAT THE PROSECUTION CANNOT USE THE DEFENDANT'S POST-ARREST SILENCE FOR IMPEACHENT PURPOSES DURING CROSS-EXAMINATION.
Abstract
THE AUTHOR ANALYZES THE DOYLE COURT'S DUE PROCESS RATIONALE AND CONCLUDES THAT THE DECISION CORRECTLY DICTATES UNIFORMITY IN STATE AND FEDERAL COURTS, ALTHOUGH THE NEED FOR A MORE THOROUGH ARTICULATION OF THE IMPLICATIONS OF DOYLE....EB