NCJ Number
224070
Date Published
March 2006
Length
37 pages
Annotation
This study attempts to build up the first empirical evidence of whether a “CSI effect” exists, what it is, and whether it impacts the administration of criminal justice via juror deliberations.
Abstract
The data strongly denies the existence of a negative effect of CSI (Crime Scene Investigation) on “not guilty” verdicts, provided that “negative” is defined as improper. The data hints that, if there is any effect of CSI, it is to exalt the infallibility of forensic evidence, favor the prosecution, or predispose jurors toward findings of guilt. In the last decade, scholars have begun investigating the impact of pop cultural representations of law, such as dramatic and “reality” shows, on the public. CBS’s top-rated drama C.S.I.: Crime Scene Investigation is the most recent television program to interest the public as well as the American Bar Association. National popular press stories are charging that the popular drama is causing a “CSI Effect.” The purpose of this study was to test for an anti-prosecution “CSI Effect.” To discover which forensic issues were most prominent on CSI, the author conducted a content analysis of the first two seasons of CSI.