U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Designing Airports for Security: An Analysis of Proposed Changes at LAX

NCJ Number
200538
Author(s)
Terry L. Schell; Brian G. Chow; Clifford Grammich
Date Published
2003
Length
8 pages
Annotation
This paper analyzes airport security as a function of airport design with specific focus on an analysis and proposed changes at the Los Angeles International Airport (LAX).
Abstract
This analysis conducted by RAND examines the relative security merits of the Los Angeles International Airport’s (LAX) Alternative D-Safety and Security which includes more features for the security of airport workers and passengers. It examines how features of Alternative D compare with current airport configuration in improving the security of airport workers and passengers against terrorist attacks. Alternative D raises two general issues for consideration in improving LAX security: (1) the net effect on security of any physical change to the airport and (2) the effect of limiting airport capacity to 78 million annual passengers, close to the current configuration of 79 million. This analysis considers the impact of reconfiguring airport facilities in helping prior detection or deterrence and ultimate limitation of casualties and operational disruption for several types of attacks. A common characteristic of both the current configuration and Alternative D that may have a great effect on airport security is the limit on capacity, with both limiting capacity to less than 80 million passengers per year. Three broad areas of change are presented to help improve security for both the current configuration and Alternative D reconfiguration: (1) expedite the movement of passengers into the secure terminal areas; (2) harden high-value structures or structural modifications; and (3) use of physical barriers. The top priority when considering security in airport planning should be given to securing the aircraft. Regardless of configuration, several improvements in airport processes could be made to improve security against terrorist attacks at LAX. However, terrorism is dynamic and terrorists adapt their methods to suit changes in weaponry and defense tactics. Terrorism prevention and security must also be dynamic.