NCJ Number
97537
Date Published
1985
Length
245 pages
Annotation
The concept of determinate sentencing is examined through a study of its origins and operation and an assessment of its impacts in three States: Illinois, Connecticut, and Minnesota.
Abstract
Critiques of indeterminate sentencing focus on two issues -- the unpredictability of a release date and sentencing inequity -- and on their consequences for prisoners. Mounting criticisms of the indeterminate sentencing model in the 1970's led to the adoption in many States of major determinate sentencing reforms. These reforms varied widely, a variety of factors undermined their implementation. Data from four prisons in the three States studied were used to compare prisoner characteristics, prisoner adjustment, and institutional climate. Interviews were conducted with correctional staff and inmate leaders, and 1,654 inmates completed self-administered questionnaires. Determinate sentencing was found to have no effect on prisoners' attitudes and behaviors or on the prison climate. Nevertheless, it has given management better planning capabilities. Inmates also have a feeling of greater sentencing equity and certainty about a fixed release date. These limited impacts may be all that realistically should be expected. Data tables, chapter notes, appendixes presenting study methodology and additional results, an index, and a list of 175 references are supplied.