Differential Effectiveness of Legal Supervision on Narcotic Addict Behavior

• NCJ Number: 126038
• Author(s): E P Deschenes; M D Anglin; G Speckart
• Date Published: 1988
• Length: 34 pages
• Grant Number(s): 86-IJ-CX-0069
• Contract Number(s): D-0001-8
• Sponsoring Agency: National Institute on Drug Abuse; California Dept of Alcohol and Drug Programs
• Corporate Author: University of California, Los Angeles
• Sale Source: National Institute of Justice/; NCJRS Photocopy Services
• Publication Type: Survey
• Language: English
• Country: United States of America

Annotation

While literature evaluating the effectiveness of drug abuse treatment is well established, the effectiveness of different types of legal supervision on the behavior of narcotic addict offenders has not received sufficient attention.

Abstract

This article examines the effect of different intensities of legal supervision on the addiction and criminal careers of narcotic addicts involved in the California Civil Addict Program. Legal supervision is defined as probation or parole, both with and without urine testing, and outpatient status (OPS or intensive parole supervision). Results from a study on narcotics addicts admitted to the methadone maintenance programs in Southern California between the years 1971 and 1973 and interviewed in 1978 indicate that legal supervision with urine testing was the most effective form of legal supervision in reducing the percentage of time in daily narcotics use and criminal behavior. 2 figures, 6 tables, and 27 references (Author abstract modified)