U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Does Treating Sex Offenders Reduce Reoffending?

NCJ Number
175903
Author(s)
C Hedderman; D Sugg
Date Published
1996
Length
4 pages
Annotation
This British study examined the 2-year reconviction rates of a small sample of sex offenders who received treatment in the community.
Abstract
This was a three-stage sex offender treatment evaluation project that examined what kinds of community-based treatment for sex offenders were effective. Phase one of the study involved a review of research into the efficacy of programs in Europe and North America, as well as a survey of programs operated by or in conjunction with probation services in England and Wales. The review found that cognitive behavioral approaches were the most promising; these involved teaching offenders to reassess their attitudes toward victims and offending; behavioral controls were also taught. Work with sex offenders in England and Wales has, with few exceptions, used cognitive behavioral therapy. In the second phase of the project, seven community-based treatment centers were selected for further in-depth study by a team of psychologists. The third phase involved an examination of reconviction rates 2, 5, and 10 years after treatment. The study found that when compared with a sample of sex offenders put on probation in 1990, those referred to the seven programs were less likely to be reconvicted for a sexual offense (5 percent compared with 9 percent). This difference still held true when differences in the samples were taken into account. Of the 11 offenders who were reconvicted, 6 committed further sexual offenses, and 5 were convicted of a nonsexual, nonviolent offense. None of the 24 offenders who were assessed as having been significantly treated had been reconvicted within 2 years. This included nine who were assessed as being highly deviant before treatment. 3 tables and 6 references