NCJ Number
104873
Date Published
1986
Length
54 pages
Annotation
This study compares the costs, advantages, and disadvantages of five approaches to confining convicted drunk drivers: (1) conventional construction of secure jail facilities, (2) modular construction of secure jail facilities, (3) construction of nonsecure facilities, (4) conversion of existing facilities, and (5) contracting for facilities.
Abstract
Constructing a new facility may lower operating costs, violence, and escapes. However, it is costly and complex. Using nonsecure work-release centers can be cheaper and more effective. Modular units can be built more rapidly and can be moved from one site to another. However, they allow less flexibility in design, may be less durable, and appear to cost more per square foot. Nonsecure work release facilities generally receive better neighborhood acceptance and are less costly to construct than jails. Converting existing buildings can cost less than constructing new nonsecure facilities, but neighborhood residents may object to conversions of schools or other buildings in residential areas. The use of contract work-release facilities involves little startup expense and avoids the problem of securing neighborhood acceptance. Its expenses are on a per-client basis, making it easier for obtaining budgetary support. However, it usually does not significantly reduce costs per offender and to date has involved only low-risk offenders. It also requires the use of contract specialists. Cost comparisons, floor plans, data tables, glossary, and 123 references.