NCJ Number
230468
Journal
Social Justice Research Volume: 23 Issue: 1 Dated: March 2010 Pages: 37-59
Date Published
March 2010
Length
23 pages
Annotation
This study presents a set of competing hypotheses to test the question of whether justice perceptions change over time (the primary hypothesis), and if so, whether the changes become more polarized over time or whether the changes vary over time.
Abstract
Competing hypotheses are used to test whether justice perceptions change over time, and if so, whether the changes become more polarized over time (more positive or negative) or whether the changes fluctuate over time based on subsequent work outcomes. Results suggest there is no polarizing or fluctuating effect in perceptions of interpersonal justice over time and no polarizing effect in perceptions of procedural justice for individuals with high initial perceptions of procedural justice. However, individuals with low initial perceptions of procedural justice increased procedural justice perceptions over time, resulting in a polarizing effect in the opposite direction of the prediction. Hierarchical regression analysis indicates initial perceptions of procedural justice tend to fluctuate over time due to intervening work decision outcomes, although in the opposite direction of what was predicted. Tables, figures, appendixes, and references (Published Abstract)