NCJ Number
253834
Journal
Social Science & Medicine Volume: 230 Dated: June 2019 Pages: 9-19
Date Published
June 2019
Length
11 pages
Annotation
This study examined whether geographic variation in felony convictions after drug possession arrests was reduced in California after Prop-47, and whether effects were offset by changes in felony convictions for other offenses not addressed by Prop-47.
Abstract
The jurisdiction where an offense is prosecuted significantly affects the severity of punishment for drug possession, creating geographic disparities in exposure to a social determinant of health. In California, felony conviction rates after drug possession arrests have historically varied enormously between counties. California Proposition 47 (Prop-47), passed in 2014, reduced drug possession offenses previously classified as felonies or wobblers (offenses for which prosecutors have discretion to file felony or misdemeanor charges) to misdemeanors. In the current study, arrests made after the implementation of Prop-47 were propensity score matched to similar arrests prior to Prop-47 to account for compositional changes in arrests. This approach compared the outcomes of individuals likely to be arrested with or without the reclassification of drug offenses. The study used mixed models to estimate the change in county variance in the probability of felony conviction. The study found that the probability of a felony conviction among those arrested for Prop-47 drug offenses declined by 14 percentage points (95 percent CI: -0.16, -0.12), from 0.20 (95 percent CI: 0.18, 0.23) to 0.06 (95 percent CI: 0.06, 0.07). Counties with higher felony conviction probabilities pre-Prop-47 declined most, reducing cross-county variance. For those arrested for drug offenses unaffected by Prop-47, the probability of felony conviction declined by 7 percentage points (95 percent CI: -0.08, -0.05), from 0.34 (95 percent CI: 0.31, 0.37) to 0.27 (0.25, 0.29). Declines in both groups were driven by fewer felony convictions for Prop-47 drug offenses, with no increases in felony convictions for concurrent offenses. Thus, reducing offense classifications for drug possession reduced previously large differences in the probability of felony convictions for people arrested for drug offenses in different counties. (publisher abstract modified)