NCJ Number
97929
Journal
Crime and Justice Volume: 7/8 Issue: 3/4 Dated: (1979/1980) Pages: 198-208
Date Published
1980
Length
11 pages
Annotation
It is argued that correctional outcome studies using quantitative methods have limited utility in evaluating correctional programs and that the potential of qualitative research has not been realized.
Abstract
The use of recidivism rates and a bias in favor of experimental designs has proved an unfortunate combination. Recidivism rates are not sensitive to changes produced by correctional programs; experimental designs may confound program effects and lead researchers to focus on average differences in some outcome measures. As corrections evaluation studies often aim at discovering ways to increase program effectiveness, a qualitative methodology focusing on process rather than outcome and using participant observation and interview techniques appears to have great merit. This approach was used in a study of the Saskatchewan Community Training Residence Program (Canada). The program's objective was to reintegrate offenders into the community, particularly through job placement. An examination of the program's objectives, policies, and practices made it possible to identify areas of inconsistency and areas in need of improvement. While no single method of program evaluation will be best in every situation, qualitative approaches appear to offer great potential rewards. Provided are 64 references.