U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Evaluating Effects of Residential Treatment for Juvenile Offenders by Statistical Metaanalysis: A Review

NCJ Number
206420
Journal
Aggression and Violent Behavior Volume: 9 Issue: 4 Dated: July 2004 Pages: 401-415
Author(s)
Hans Grietens; Walter Hellinckx
Editor(s)
Vincent B. Van Hasselt, Michel Hersen
Date Published
July 2004
Length
15 pages
Annotation
This study reviews the use of statistical metaanalyses in evaluating the effects of residential treatment for juvenile offenders in order to examine the mean effect sizes and reductions of recidivism reported for this group.
Abstract
Statistical metaanalyses is seen as helpful in synthesizing results of primary studies on the treatment of juvenile offenders. This study evaluated the designs and the findings from statistical metaanalyses on the effects of residential treatment for juvenile offenders by means of a second-order narrative review. The study attempts to find out what were the mean effects of residential treatment for young offenders reported in statistical metaanalyses, to critically discuss the advantages and drawbacks of metaanalysis as a method of research synthesis in this field, and to point to certain key elements on which future syntheses of research on the effects of residential treatment for juvenile offenders should focus. The metaanalyses were selected by means of a stepwise approach. The list of selected metaanalytic studies was reduced by excluding metaanalyses dealing only either with adult offenders or with community-based interventions. The evaluation of metaanalyses was conducted by means of a narrative review. The review provided answers to two basic questions: (1) were the effects of treatment large and (2) which variables influenced treatment effects? Treatment of juvenile offenders produced an average reduction of recidivism by about 9 percent. The review showed that the “nothing works” hypothesis, concerning treatment effects for juvenile offenders, could be replaced by moderate optimism. Recommendations for future research suggest a focus on European contexts and multiple measures to evaluate long-term effects. References