U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Evaluation of the New Pretrial Release Recommendation System in New York City: Phase I of the Post-Implementation Research

NCJ Number
215744
Author(s)
Qudsia Siddiqi Ph.D.
Date Published
June 2004
Length
31 pages
Annotation
This report on Phase I of a postimplementation evaluation of New York City's new system for recommending a defendant for release-on-recognizance (ROR) examines whether the new system recommends more defendants for ROR and whether there has been a change in judicial release/detention decisions at arraignment under the new system.
Abstract
The evaluation findings from Phase I show that the new system for recommending defendants for ROR performed as predicted. Compared to the old system, it recommended a substantially higher proportion of defendants for ROR and decreased the proportion of moderate-risk defendants. The new system showed a 2-percent increase in the overall ROR rate at arraignment compared to the old system. Under the old system, the low-risk and moderate-risk groups did not differ regarding release decisions at arraignment. Under the new system, defendants recommended for ROR had the highest ROR rate, which was followed by the moderate-risk group. Defendants who were not recommended for ROR by the Criminal Justice Agency (CJA) had the lowest ROR rate. CJA's new recommendation system is based on a defendant's ties to the community and criminal history. It considers whether the defendant has an address in the New York City area; has a working residential telephone or cell phone; is employed, in school, or in a training program full-time; expects someone at his/her arraignment; has any prior bench warrants; or has any open case counts. Data for Phase I of the postimplementation evaluation were drawn from a cohort of arrests made from November 1, 2003, through January 31, 2004. The dataset used in the analysis contained 59,551 defendants who were held for arraignment in criminal court. 9 tables

Downloads

No download available

Availability