U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Face-to-Face Confrontation: Effects of Closed-Circuit Technology on Children's Eyewitness Testimony and Jurors' Decisions

NCJ Number
174311
Journal
Law and Human Behavior Volume: 22 Issue: 2 Dated: April 1998 Pages: 165-203
Author(s)
G S Goodman; A E Tobey; J M Batterman-Faunce; H Orcutt; S Thomas; C Shapiro; T Sachsenmaier
Date Published
1998
Length
39 pages
Annotation
This article examines effects of closed-circuit technology on children's testimony and jurorsþ perceptions of child witnesses.
Abstract
Eighty-five 5- to-6-year-olds and 101 8- to 9-year-old children individually participated in play sessions of mock trials with an unfamiliar male confederate. Approximately 2 weeks later, children individually testified about the events at a city courtroom. Mock juries composed of community recruits viewed the trials, with the children's testimony presented either live in open court or over closed-circuit television. Overall, older children were more accurate witnesses. However, older children also produced more inaccurate information in free recall. Use of closed-circuit technology led to decreased suggestibility for younger children. Testifying in open court was associated with children experiencing more pretrial anxiety. Closed-circuit technology did not diminish factfinders' abilities to discriminate accurate from inaccurate child testimony, and did not directly bias jurors against the defendant. However, closed-circuit testimony did bias jurors against child witnesses. Jurors tended to base their impressions of witness credibility on perceived confidence and consistency. Figures, notes, tables, references