NCJ Number
117401
Journal
Judges' Journal Volume: 28 Issue: 1 Dated: (Winter 1989) Pages: 5-9,42
Date Published
1989
Length
6 pages
Annotation
The effectiveness with which the judicial responsibility for collecting fines is carried out has important implications for the effectiveness of the fine as a sanction and for the court as an institution, so courts should use some of the innovative methods already being used to increase to proportion of fines paid.
Abstract
Recent studies have found that many judges report problems in collecting fines and that substantial proportions of fines and court costs are not paid. However, some courts have collection rates as high as 95 percent. They use techniques to ensure that records are maintained and offenders are constantly reminded of their obligation. In addition, these courts impose further sanctions if fines are not paid. Innovative approaches to collection and enforcement include the use of installment payments, credit cards, computerized recordkeeping systems, contracts with private telemarketing firms for reminder services, and the use of collection agencies. However, organizational and political factors appear to account for the failure of many courts to use these techniques. 3 references.