NCJ Number
111870
Journal
Federal Probation Volume: 49 Issue: 4 Dated: (December 1985) Pages: 49-56
Date Published
1985
Length
8 pages
Annotation
Classification systems, used in corrections, to predict recidivism and to determine the needs of the offender for assigning appropriate treatment, should clearly explain the function and purpose; be dynamic and theoretically based; and be feasible.
Abstract
Since 1980, the Federal Probation System has used a Risk Prediction Scale (RPS 80) which classifies offenders for 'high activity' or 'low activity' supervision. The items used in this scale include completion of a high school education, age of offender, prior arrests, and employment history. The specific classifications of offenders generally include maximum, medium, and minimum supervision levels and may vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. A study conducted by the National Institute of Corrections involving 474 probation and parole officers working in nine States in which a new case management system was implemented, concluded that three of every four respondents viewed their system as beneficial. The degree of satisfaction with these systems depended on the commitment to the system by administrators, the preparation for changes, and the ease of the transition from one system to the other. Case management systems in New York City, Ohio, and California are discussed. The systems work if officers make better decisions on cases, make more appropriate referrals to community service agencies, are more efficient in their work, establish better communciations with supervsiors, and are more confident and satisfied with their own job performance. Even though recidivism rates do not drop significantly, case management systems will continue to be refined, resulting in significant improvement in community corrections. 3 tables and 16 footnotes.