NCJ Number
188717
Journal
Corrections Today Volume: 63 Issue: 2 Dated: April 2001 Pages: 93-96
Date Published
April 2001
Length
4 pages
Annotation
This article describes the "Think Tank" process used in planning a 3,000-bed, high-level, medium-security prison near Indian Springs, Nevada.
Abstract
The Think Tank process began by using staff input in the development of a comprehensive function and space program. Staff were organized by an assistant director to ensure that feedback was received from all levels, from wardens to officers, and from maintenance to security. Input from staff who represented the 41 functions that would be incorporated into the facility was obtained through questionnaires and interviews. During the interviews, staff were challenged to think abstractly when considering what would work best for their specific operations and space within the new facility. Input included developing mission statements and goals for each function that would support the facility's overall mission and goals. The "wish list" was assessed and evaluated against American Correctional Association standards and State regulations. The Think Tank's goal was to ensure that staff clearly and thoughtfully stated what they wanted for the facility while considering the implications for facility design and size. Next, Think Tank participants prioritized the facility's 41 functions. Overall, the Think Tank process allowed time for programmers and designers to clearly understand user requirements prior to facility design and construction.