U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

I-level (Interpersonal Maturity Level) and the Treatment of Delinquents

NCJ Number
75673
Journal
California Youth Authority Quarterly Volume: 33 Issue: 4 Dated: (Winter 1980) Pages: 26-37
Author(s)
R F Wedge; R D White; T Palmer
Date Published
1980
Length
12 pages
Annotation
This article describes the Interpersonal Maturity Level (I-level) classification system, which is used by the California Youth Authority for classifying and identifying different types of youth; use of the technique in several youth programs is highlighted.
Abstract
The belief that no one treatment method can equally benefit all types of offenders has led to the development of differential treatment techniques and classification methods. The I-level, or level of integration, is one such method which has been used with delinquent offenders since 1971. The I-level is comprised of a series of points along a relative continuum of cognitive development. Each level of the continuum is characterized by a different frame of reference that reflects how an individual perceives and reacts to the environment. Three maturity levels are defined. Those at maturity level two perceive the world in an egocentric manner, being concerned primarily with their own needs. Youths at maturity level three are aware that their own behavior has something to do with whether their needs and desires are satisfied. Those at level four have more fully internalized a set of standards which they use to judge their own behavior and the behavior of others. Subtypes have been described for levels three and four. The I-level classification system has been an integral part of several California Youth Authority treatment programs, including the Fricot Ranch School, the Community Treatment Project, and the Group Home Project. Studies of the classification method were conducted in conjunction with admissions to these programs, and there were sufficient positive results to encourage the continuation of the I-level system. The I-level method is also being used outside California and in foreign nations such as England, Canada, and Yugoslavia. A table and 18 references are provided.