NCJ Number
248009
Journal
Justice Quarterly Volume: 31 Issue: 5 Dated: October 2014 Pages: 852-881
Date Published
October 2014
Length
30 pages
Annotation
Research suggests that restorative justice (RJ) conferences are more just than traditional court processing due to the presence of procedural justice (PJ).
Abstract
Research suggests that restorative justice (RJ) conferences are more just than traditional court processing due to the presence of procedural justice (PJ). These conferences also promote reintegrative shaming which, in contrast to disintegrative shaming, allows offenders to repair their ties with the community. Yet, fairness and the type of shaming experienced may depend on perceptions of the offender. We argue that the personality traits of negative emotionality and low constraint influence offenders' evaluations of the fairness of these conferences, which have implications for their experience of shaming. We test these arguments using data from a sample of 498 offenders involved in the Australian Reintegrative Shaming Experiments. Results reveal that personality traits affect perceptions of PJ and both types of shaming, and that PJ mediates these effects. The findings support the notion that RJ conferences are perceived to be procedurally just and reintegrative for certain types of offenders. Abstract published by arrangement with Taylor Francis.