U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Judicial Discretion and Sentencing Disparity in Adult Felony Courts in Israel

NCJ Number
97456
Journal
Journal of Criminal Justice Volume: 13 Issue: 2 Dated: (1985) Pages: 99-115
Author(s)
B Z Cohen; G Fishman; J Soroka
Date Published
1985
Length
17 pages
Annotation
This study focuses on a series of legal, extralegal, and systemic variables presumed to affect the workings of criminal-justice systems.
Abstract
These variables are employed first to analyze the decision of the court to refer defendants for presentence investigation when such a referral is not mandatory, then to examine how these referrals, once made, influence disposition. The relationship of legal representation to disposition is also explored. The findings contradict conventional wisdom regarding the advantages to defendants of legal representation and of presentence reports. Lawyers do not appear to influence either referral or sentencing. The presentence reports are requested by judges seeking to individualize their sentencing decisions, but this process of individualization is as likely to result in harsher sentences as in greater leniency. (Author abstract)